Judney Clerger Percy

06/26/2026

Reports say Venezuela was hit by two powerful earthquakes on June 24, 2026, with serious damage and ongoing rescue efforts.

𝙈𝙮 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙩 𝙜𝙤𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙑𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙯𝙪𝙚𝙡𝙖 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙛𝙖𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙮 𝙖𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙙𝙚𝙫𝙖𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙝𝙦𝙪𝙖𝙠𝙚.

As someone who advocates for better spaces, safer construction, thoughtful design, and building practices that protect lives, moments like this remind us that architecture and construction are never only about walls, roofs, or aesthetics. They are about people, safety, dignity, and resilience.

Natural disasters expose the deep responsibility we carry as designers, builders, engineers, planners, and community advocates. We must continue to push for stronger structures, better codes, safer communities, and construction practices that respond to the realities of our regions.

Today, I stand in solidarity with Venezuela. May comfort reach those who are grieving, may strength surround the rescue teams, and may this tragedy renew our commitment to build better, build safer, and build with humanity in mind. 🙏🏽🇻🇪

06/09/2026

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐨𝐧 𝐉𝐮𝐧𝐞 𝟕𝐭𝐡 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐚 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐝𝐲. 𝐈𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐥𝐬𝐨 𝐚 𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧.

After the earthquake that hit the Philippines, one image stood out to me deeply: an older church still standing, while a newer building beside it collapsed.

This contrast forces us to reflect. A building does not stand because it is new. A building stands because it was understood, designed, and constructed with responsibility.

In moments like this, the truth of construction is exposed. The soil, the structure, the materials, the foundation, the workmanship, the supervision, and the respect for seismic reality all become visible. What was ignored during construction becomes dangerous during disaster.

This is where education plays a key role in society. Construction is not only about putting blocks, concrete, steel, or finishes together. It is about understanding context. It is about knowing how a building should respond to the environment where it stands.

As professionals, we need to ask ourselves: are we really building for the place, or are we simply building to finish? Are we learning from the resilience of older buildings, or are we ignoring the lessons they still carry?

This reflection speaks strongly to Haiti. We know the pain of earthquakes. We know what happens when buildings are constructed without proper studies, without code enforcement, without professional supervision, and without respect for the land. Yet too often, we continue to build without enough consciousness.

The Philippines reminds us again that resilience is not optional. For Haiti, this lesson should be taken seriously. We cannot keep building as if beauty is enough. We cannot keep treating construction as a simple transaction. Every building is a responsibility toward the people who will live, work, pray, learn, or gather inside it.

The buildings of the past should not only be admired. They should be studied. Their logic, proportions, materials, and relationship to context can teach us. And with the knowledge we have today, we should be building safer, stronger, and more consciously.

Because when the earth shakes, it does not care how modern a building looks. It reveals how responsibly it was built.

And as professionals, when we fail to build with consciousness, we fail our communities.
----------------------------------------------------------------

𝐋𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐝𝐞 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐢 𝐚 𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐩é 𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬 𝐥𝐞 𝟕 𝐣𝐮𝐢𝐧 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 𝐧’𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐞𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐮𝐧𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐠é𝐝𝐢𝐞. 𝐂’𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢 𝐮𝐧𝐞 𝐥𝐞ç𝐨𝐧 𝐞𝐧 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢è𝐫𝐞 𝐝𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧.

Après le séisme qui a frappé les Philippines, une image m’a profondément marquée : une ancienne église encore debout, tandis qu’un bâtiment plus récent, situé juste à côté, s’est effondré.

Ce contraste nous oblige à réfléchir. Un bâtiment ne tient pas simplement parce qu’il est neuf. Un bâtiment tient parce qu’il a été compris, conçu et construit avec responsabilité.

Dans des moments comme celui-ci, la vérité de la construction est exposée. Le sol, la structure, les matériaux, les fondations, la qualité de la main-d’œuvre, la supervision et le respect de la réalité sismique deviennent visibles. Ce qui a été négligé pendant la construction devient dangereux au moment du désastre.

C’est là que l’éducation joue un rôle essentiel dans notre société. La construction ne consiste pas seulement à assembler des blocs, du béton, de l’acier ou des finitions. Elle consiste à comprendre le contexte. Elle consiste à savoir comment un bâtiment doit répondre à l’environnement dans lequel il se trouve.

En tant que professionnels, nous devons nous poser les bonnes questions : construisons-nous réellement pour le lieu, ou construisons-nous simplement pour terminer ? Apprenons-nous de la résilience des bâtiments anciens, ou ignorons-nous les leçons qu’ils continuent de porter ?

Cette réflexion parle fortement au contexte haïtien. Nous connaissons la douleur des tremblements de terre. Nous savons ce qui arrive lorsque les bâtiments sont construits sans études appropriées, sans application rigoureuse des normes, sans supervision professionnelle et sans respect du terrain. Pourtant, trop souvent, nous continuons à construire sans assez de conscience.

Les Philippines nous rappellent encore une fois que la résilience n’est pas une option. Pour Haïti, cette leçon doit être prise au sérieux. Nous ne pouvons pas continuer à construire comme si la beauté suffisait. Nous ne pouvons pas continuer à traiter la construction comme une simple transaction. Chaque bâtiment est une responsabilité envers les personnes qui vont y vivre, y travailler, y prier, y apprendre ou s’y rassembler.

Les bâtiments du passé ne doivent pas seulement être admirés. Ils doivent être étudiés. Leur logique, leurs proportions, leurs matériaux et leur relation avec le contexte peuvent encore nous enseigner. Et avec les connaissances que nous avons aujourd’hui, nous devrions construire de manière plus sûre, plus solide et plus consciente.

Parce que lorsque la terre tremble, elle ne se soucie pas de l’apparence moderne d’un bâtiment. Elle révèle à quel point il a été construit avec responsabilité.

Et en tant que professionnels, lorsque nous échouons à construire avec conscience, nous échouons envers nos communautés.
📷 Foundon internet

05/25/2026

●.◉𝐅𝐨𝐧𝐤𝐬𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐃𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐀𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬●.◉

Nan achitekti, anpil fwa nou redui fonksyonalite ak kesyon efikasite sèlman- èske espas la “fonksyone” oswa non.

Men vrè sans fonksyonalite a ale pi lwen pase sa. Yon batiman fonksyonèl se pa sèlman yon espas ki byen òganize. Se yon espas ki fasilite lavi chak jou, diminye strès, adapte ak konpòtman moun, epi kreye konfò atravè eksperyans moun ap viv ladan l.

Kòm itilizatè espas, nou souvan konsantre sou aparans: stil batiman dekorasyon, materyo chè, oswa imaj jeneral li bay. Men anpil espas ki bèl pa rive sèvi moun k ap viv ladan yo vrèman.
Fonksyonalite se sa ki fòme lavi chak jou. Li enfliyanse fason nou deplase, repoze, kominike, respire, konsantre, epi santi nou nan yon espas

Bon achitekti pa sèlman fèt pou wè sèlman, li fèt pou viv atravè sans yo.

Yon batiman byen konsevwa amelyore lavi moun an silans, menm lè yo pa rann yo kont sa.

𝐄 𝐬𝐢 𝐯𝐫è 𝐛𝐨𝐭𝐞 𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐤𝐭𝐢 𝐚 𝐬𝐞 𝐤𝐚𝐩𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐥𝐢 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐲𝐞𝐧 𝐩𝐨𝐮 𝐤𝐨𝐧𝐩𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐧 𝐞𝐤𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐲𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐧?
Ki opinyonw sou sa, fèm konnen nan kòmante yo.

05/22/2026

05/12/2026

Enèji, Achitekti, ak Avni Konstriksyon an Ayiti

Lè nou pale de enèji nan konstriksyon, kesyon an pa ta dwe limite sèlman ak panno solè.

Nan achitekti, fason yon batiman oryante, jan li pran van, limyè natirèl, lonbraj, ak materyo yo itilize yo gen yon gwo enpak sou kantite enèji li bezwen pou fonksyone.

Nan anpil peyi, konsepsyon pasif se premye etap la pou diminye konsomasyon enèji. Teknoloji, tankou enèji solè, vini apre pou konplete yon konsepsyon ki deja efikas.

Nan kontèks tankou Ayiti, nou souvan chèche solisyon rapid. Men pi bon enèji a se enèji batiman pa bezwen konsome a.

Si nou vle bati pi byen, kesyon enèji a dwe kòmanse ak achitekti.

Kijan nou ka konsevwa espas ki travay avèk klima a olye pou yo goumen kont li?

🔗 Semèn sa a, Club Architecture Club - Achitekti Haiti ap òganize yon diskisyon sou enèji solè ak wòl li nan anviwònman bati a. Yon bon okazyon pou nou reflechi ansanm sou avni konstriksyon an Ayiti.

04/03/2026

Ann Ayiti, espas piblik pa janm te yon priyorite.

Map pale de lari a mache yo, dezòd sikilasyon an, moun ki pa ka sikile paske espas la pa te janm konsèp pou yo. Sa se yon echèk nan design.

Me kounye a mwen ap poze yon lòt kesyon ki pi fon:

Ki kote moun ann Ayiti sipoze pran souf?

Pa gen pak. Pa gen espas vèt. Pa gen kote pou timoun jwe an sekirite. Pa gen kote pou kominote a reyini san presyon komèsyal oswa sikilasyon. Espas rekreyasyon sa ki sipoze defini kalite lavi yon vil prèske pa egziste.

Sa pa yon aksidan. Se rezilta yon neglijans kap fèt depi lonta nan planifikasyon iben, kote bezwen moun pa te janm nan sant desizyon yo.

Kòm achitèk, e sa ki reveye m. Paske konsevwa espas ki ba moun diyite - kote pou yo reyini, pou yo jwe, pou yo egziste san yo pa nan wout pèsonn - se pa yon liks. Se yon bezwen fondamantal.

Nou pral diskite sou sa nan Architecture Club - Achitekti Haiti an semèn sa a. Men pou mwen, refleksyon an deja kòmanse.

02/08/2026

𝙀𝙩𝙞𝙠 𝘼𝙘𝙝𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙠𝙩𝙞 𝘾𝙝𝙖𝙠 𝙅𝙤𝙪
Sometimes, what is most concerning in architecture is not what shocks us, but what no longer does.

I recently encountered a space in an airport where two toilet bowls were installed in the same room, without separation. What stood out was not the configuration itself, but how easily it had been accepted as normal.

This kind of spatial arrangement does not emerge from a single poor decision. It is the result of repeated practices- copied, transmitted, and rarely questioned. Over time, the absence of privacy becomes invisible, and dignity is treated as optional rather than fundamental.

In the Haitian context, these decisions are often shaped by urgency, cost constraints, limited oversight, and inherited building habits. But constraint alone does not explain the persistence of such practices.
Architecture, as lived experience, requires us to examine how design choices normalize certain conditions of living.
𝘼𝙩 𝙬𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙥𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙩 𝙙𝙤𝙚𝙨 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙘𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙛𝙡𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙬𝙚 𝙙𝙚𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙣 𝙨𝙥𝙖𝙘𝙚?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gen fwa, sa ki pi grav nan achitekti a se pa sa ki choke nou, men sa nou vin abitye avè l.

Dènyèman, mwen te wè yon espas nan yon epòt kote yo te mete de twalèt nan menm chanm nan, san separasyon. Sa ki te frape m plis, se pa aranjman an li menm, men jan li te sanble nòmal pou tout moun.

Òganizasyon espas konsa pa soti nan yon sèl move desizyon. Li soti nan pratik yo repete, yo kopye, yo transmèt, san yo pa janm poze kestyon sou yo. Avèk tan, absans vi prive a vin envizib, epi diyite vin parèt kòm yon opsyon, olye de yon baz.

Nan kontèks ayisyen an, anpil nan chwa sa yo sòti nan ijans, mank mwayen, mank kontwòl, ak abitid konstriksyon yo eritye. Men kontrent sèlman pa esplike poukisa pratik sa yo kontinye egziste.

Lè n ap konsidere achitekti kòm eksperyans vivan, nou oblije gade kijan desizyon konsepsyon yo fè sèten kondisyon lavi vin parèt nòmal.
𝙉𝙖𝙣 𝙠𝙞 𝙢𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙨𝙮𝙤𝙣 𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙨𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙛𝙡𝙚𝙠𝙨𝙮𝙤𝙣 𝙣𝙖𝙣 𝙛𝙖𝙨𝙤𝙣 𝙣𝙤𝙪 𝙠𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙚𝙫𝙬𝙖 𝙚𝙨𝙥𝙖𝙨?

01/31/2026

☆𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙧𝙖𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 & 𝙄𝙣𝙚𝙦𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮☆
Infrastructure often remains invisible—until it fails.

Roads, drainage systems, power networks, and water access quietly structure daily life, shaping who can move, who is protected, and who is exposed to risk.

In many contexts, including Haiti, infrastructure gaps are not accidental. They reflect long histories of uneven investment and political neglect. Architecture, when detached from infrastructure, risks becoming symbolic rather than functional.

Thinking about architecture as lived experience requires acknowledging that buildings do not stand alone. They rely on systems that either support or undermine everyday life.

Addressing inequality in the built environment demands a closer relationship between architectural design and infrastructural justice.

𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐧?
-----------------‐-----------------------------------------------------------
☆𝙀𝙣𝙛𝙧𝙖𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙠𝙩𝙞 & 𝙄𝙣𝙚𝙜𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙚☆
Enfrastrikti souvan rete envizib—jiskaske li tonbe an pann.

Wout, drenaj, rezo kouran, ak aksè a dlo òganize lavi chak jou an silans, epi yo enfliyanse kiyès ki ka deplase, kiyès ki pwoteje, ak kiyès ki plis ekspoze ak risk.

Nan anpil kontèks, tankou Ayiti, mank enfrastrikti pa yon aksidan. Li reflete istwa envestisman inegal ak neglijans politik. Lè achitekti dekonekte ak enfrastrikti, li ka vin plis senbolik pase fonksyonèl.

Panse achitekti kòm eksperyans vivan mande pou n rekonèt ke bilding pa kanpe pou kont yo. Yo depan de sistèm ki swa soutni lavi chak jou, swa fè li vin pi difisil.

Abòde inegalite nan anviwònman bati a mande pou achitekti antre an dyalòg dirèk ak jistis enfrastriktirèl.

𝐊𝐢𝐣𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐭è𝐤 𝐲𝐨 𝐤𝐚 𝐤𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐞𝐧𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐤𝐭𝐢 𝐤ò𝐦 𝐲𝐨𝐧 𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐚𝐧 𝐤𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐩𝐬𝐲𝐨𝐧, 𝐨𝐥𝐲𝐞 𝐝𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐧 𝐝è𝐲è?

01/28/2026

HOUSING & CARE
Housing is often discussed in terms of quantity—units delivered, density achieved, costs reduced. Yet housing is first and foremost a space of care.

It is where bodies rest, recover, and carry daily life. For children, elders, and caregivers, the quality of housing directly shapes well-being.

In many contexts, including Haiti, housing must respond not only to climate and economy, but to extended family structures and shared responsibilities. These lived realities are rarely captured by standardized housing models.

Viewing housing through the lens of care shifts architectural priorities—from efficiency alone toward dignity, adaptability, and long-term resilience.
𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞 𝐢𝐟 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞 𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐚 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧?
--------------‐-----------------------------------------------------------
Souvan, yo pale de lojman an tèm de kantite—konbyen inite, dansite, oswa pri. Men lojman, anvan tout bagay, se yon espas swen.

Se la kò moun repoze, refè, epi pote lavi chak jou. Pou timoun, granmoun aje, ak moun k ap pran swen lòt moun, kalite lojman an gen gwo enpak sou byennèt.

Nan anpil kontèks, tankou Ayiti, lojman dwe reponn pa sèlman ak klima ak ekonomi, men ak estrikti fanmi elaji ak responsabilite pataje. Reyalite sa yo souvan absan nan modèl lojman estandadize.

Gade lojman atravè priz swen chanje priyorite achitekti—soti nan efikasite sèlman, pou rive nan diyite, adaptabilite, ak rezilyans alontèm.
𝐊𝐢𝐣𝐚𝐧 𝐤𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐩𝐬𝐲𝐨𝐧 𝐥𝐨𝐣𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐚 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐣𝐞 𝐬𝐢 𝐬𝐰𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐞 𝐤𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐤ò𝐦 𝐲𝐨𝐧 𝐯𝐚𝐥è 𝐟𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐧𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐤𝐭𝐢?

01/27/2026

●.◉𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐬 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐲 𝐦𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐲.●.◉

Concrete, wood, metal—none of them are neutral. They hold histories of labor, climate, economy, and care. The same material can signal permanence in one place and precarity in another.

In Haiti, concrete often represents durability and protection, even when it limits adaptability or thermal comfort. In other contexts, lighter materials are embraced for flexibility and climate responsiveness.

These choices are never only technical. They are shaped by experience, trust, and what people believe will last.

Thinking about architecture as lived experience requires asking not just what materials perform best, but what they mean to the communities who build with them.

☆𝙃𝙤𝙬 𝙙𝙤 𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙘𝙝𝙤𝙞𝙘𝙚𝙨 𝙧𝙚𝙛𝙡𝙚𝙘𝙩 𝙘𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙮 𝙖𝙨 𝙢𝙪𝙘𝙝 𝙖𝙨 𝙙𝙚𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙣 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣?☆
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
●.◉𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐲𝐨 𝐲𝐨 𝐩𝐨𝐭𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐦𝐰𝐚.●.◉

Beton, bwa, metal—pa gen youn ki net. Yo pote istwa travay, klima, ekonomi, ak swen. Menm materyo a ka vle di pèmanans nan yon kote, epi frajilite nan yon lòt.

An Ayiti, beton souvan senbolize solidite ak pwoteksyon, menm lè li limite adaptabilite oswa konfò tèmik. Nan lòt kontèks, materyo pi lejè yo chwazi pou fleksibilite ak adaptasyon ak klima.

Chwa sa yo pa janm sèlman teknik. Yo sòti nan eksperyans, konfyans, ak sa moun kwè ki ka dire.

Panse achitekti kòm eksperyans vivan mande pou n mande:
☆𝙠𝙞𝙟𝙖𝙣 𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙮𝙤 𝙮𝙤 𝙧𝙚𝙛𝙡𝙚𝙩𝙚 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙬𝙖 𝙠𝙤𝙡𝙚𝙠𝙩𝙞𝙛, 𝙥𝙖 𝙨è𝙡𝙢𝙖𝙣 𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙨𝙮𝙤𝙣 𝙠𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙚𝙥𝙨𝙮𝙤𝙣 𝙖𝙣?☆